by Martin Roche
Last month The Canterbury Journal exclusively broke the story that our MP Rosie Duffield was facing a “motion of censure” tabled by some members of the Canterbury and Whitstable Labour Party.
Just 24 hours later the motion was withdrawn. The event has left its mark on Ms Duffield, who indicated after the dust had settled that she was leaving her options open about standing again for parliament.
Her experience made think more deeply about the roles and responsibilities of MPs than I have since being a student of politics and international relations nearly 40 years ago.
How individual character and personality affects and moulds the behaviour of politicians is of critical importance.
Politics is of course about policy and ideology, but is essentially about human beings making human decisions and human judgements.
The character and personality of our leaders matters. When we vote we are as much making a judgement about the character of those we vote for as we are making a decision about supporting a party or a set of politics.
I grew up in a political household. My dad was a lifelong Tory, my mother a Liberal and one of my uncles, later a judge, was a leading figure in establishing the Scottish National Party at Glasgow University.
MPs of Labour, Liberal and Conservative came to visit.
Political conversation was a normal part of daily life and political events discussed and argued over.
Until the 1980s, politics in Britain was not simply a way of deciding how to deliver public services and foreign policy, but a matter of passionate and intensive debate and deeply held convictions.
Two camps of two vastly different ideologies. The Conservatives and capitalism, Labour and socialism.
The politics of ideology took a back seat after the triumph of Margaret Thatcher’s free-market ideology.
Heavy manufacturing industry and the working class towns that sustained working class socialism went into decline.
So too did the trades union movement. Millions of working class households moved up into property ownership and in so doing became middle class.
At the other end of the wealth scale, vast fortunes were accumulated by the masters of the universe in finance, computing, IT and mobile phones.
Tony Blair’s Labour party found a halfway house between Thatcherism and Socialism that voters seemed to like. It was sometimes difficult to see what divided Blair’s Labour from Cameron’s Tories. Ideology appeared to evaporate from mainstream British politics.
Not any more. We are back in the world of my childhood.
On one side the hard right of Jacob Rees-Mogg and on the other the hard Left of Jeremy Corbyn.
It so happens that I’m not attracted to the ideologies of either of these men, but I’d be stupid not to recognise that the face of British politics has and will continue to change dramatically.
There’s talk of a general election in the air. Whether we have one before the due date of 2022 time will tell.
But the high temperature of British politics prompted me to think about the qualities I’d expect to find in someone aiming to be my MP and seeking my vote. So, here you have my five core wants.
The candidates for all the parties asking for the votes of the people of the Canterbury constituency at the next general election really should be expected know the basic history of the place: from the Romans to becoming the seat of English Christianity, from being a region dependent on agriculture, mining and shipping to becoming a centre of learning and a major tourism destination.
What forged this place made it the place it is today. If you don’t know your history of Canterbury how can you know Canterbury? I’m an incomer of 17 years, so I’m still learning.
I’ve laid out here the the top five qualities I want to see in MPs. What are yours?
Martin Roche is a business consultant and government adviser who lives just outside Canterbury. He writes regularly for African Leadership Magazine.
The Canterbury Journal welcomes occasional contributors. Please get in touch if you would like to contribute too.